# O2.6 Assess DPI against alternative policy options

{% tabs %}
{% tab title="Principle" %}
[O2 Evolve with evidence](https://safedpi.gitbook.io/safeguards/universal-dpi-safeguards-framework/principles/operational-principles/o2-evolve-with-evidence)
{% endtab %}

{% tab title="Risk" %}
[SV5 Unsustainability,](https://safedpi.gitbook.io/safeguards/universal-dpi-safeguards-framework/risks/risks-to-structural-vulnerabilities) [RI1Discrimination](https://safedpi.gitbook.io/safeguards/universal-dpi-safeguards-framework/risks/risks-to-inclusion)
{% endtab %}

{% tab title="Life Cycle Stage" %}
[L1 Conception and Scoping](https://safedpi.gitbook.io/safeguards/universal-dpi-safeguards-framework/responsible-authorities/r3-donor/l1-conception-and-scoping)
{% endtab %}
{% endtabs %}

## Practice

* Conduct baseline studies and contextual analyses to assess the feasibility, benefits and risks of DPI in specific settings.
* Compare DPI with alternative policy options, considering factors like inclusivity, scalability, cost-effectiveness, and potential for unintended consequences.
* Engage stakeholders, including civil society, industry experts and end-users in the evaluation process to gather diverse perspectives.