# O2.1 Assess DPI against alternative policy options

{% tabs %}
{% tab title="Principle" %}
[O2. Evolve with evidence ](https://safedpi.gitbook.io/safeguards/universal-dpi-safeguards-framework/principles/operational-principles/o2-evolve-with-evidence)
{% endtab %}

{% tab title="Risk" %}
[SV5 Unsustainability](https://safedpi.gitbook.io/safeguards/universal-dpi-safeguards-framework/risks/risks-to-structural-vulnerabilities)

[RI1 Discrimination](https://safedpi.gitbook.io/safeguards/universal-dpi-safeguards-framework/risks/risks-to-inclusion)
{% endtab %}

{% tab title="Life Cycle Stage" %}
[L1 Conception and Scoping ](https://safedpi.gitbook.io/safeguards/universal-dpi-safeguards-framework/life-cycle-stages)
{% endtab %}
{% endtabs %}

## Practices

> * Conduct baseline studies and contextual analyses to assess the feasibility, benefits and risks of DPI in specific settings.
> * Compare DPI with alternative policy options, considering factors like inclusivity, scalability, cost-effectiveness and potential for unintended consequences.
> * Engage stakeholders, including civil society, industry experts, and end-users in the evaluation process to gather diverse perspectives.

<table data-view="cards"><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td></td><td><mark style="color:yellow;"><strong>Case Study</strong></mark></td><td>Coming soon..</td></tr><tr><td></td><td><mark style="color:yellow;"><strong>References</strong></mark></td><td>Coming soon..</td></tr></tbody></table>